Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Attendance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board delays vote on truancy-prevention home-visit plan after concerns over police role and timing
Summary
Staff proposed a truancy-prevention team to perform morning outreach, quarterly 'truancy sweeps' (home visits) and courtesy transportation to reduce chronic absenteeism; board members asked staff to narrow the timing threshold, clarify when law enforcement would be present, and explain transportation logistics and costs before approval.
Sarah Bailey and colleagues presented a division plan to reduce chronic absenteeism through morning data pulls, phone outreach and quarterly truancy sweeps that would include home visits and, when families request and sign permission, courtesy transportation. Bailey said the "Be Here PG" campaign and outreach helped reduce the division's chronic absenteeism from 22.4% to 19.5%.
The proposal would use a truancy-prevention team including attendance officers, school administrators and representatives from court services, the Prince George Police Department and the sheriff's office. Bailey said law enforcement involvement is intended primarily for staff safety and to provide vehicle resources: "they are driving us so that we can have more outreach in a faster capacity, and they stay in the car while members of the team go to the door," she said.
Board members raised objections to visits tied to a single unexcused absence, saying that knocking on a family's door after one missed day risks appearing punitive. Members also sought detail on who would staff on-call transportation, how those staff would be compensated, and whether visits would target students with documented excused absences. Staff clarified that morning calls are made first and that documented excused events (school trips, doctor notes) would remove families from the list; they also proposed further refinement of thresholds and agreed to return with specifics.
The board did not adopt the plan and asked staff to return with more precise operational details and a recommended threshold (examples discussed ranged from after five unexcused absences to targeting chronic absences).
