Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Stevens Point board opens discussion on regulating private plantings in the public right-of-way
Summary
City staff presented draft concepts to regulate private plantings in the public right-of-way, including zoning 'zones' for vision triangles, driveway clearances, and swale protections; board members and residents urged more research on stormwater impacts and clearer enforcement before adopting ordinance language.
City public-works staff presented a preliminary proposal on July 13 to regulate private plantings within the public right-of-way, outlining different zones and suggested limits on planting heights, distances from driveways, and vision triangles intended to protect sightlines and infrastructure.
The Director of Public Works described the staff approach as illustrative rather than final code language, showing multiple zone types (for example, a 'vision triangle' zone, a driveway-clearance zone, and variable zones where sidewalks exist) and saying staff will refine specifics after board feedback. He cautioned the board that it is likely too late to restrict plantings made this season but that the draft is intended to guide future rules.
A committee member warned that planting in stormwater swales can impair drainage and infiltration. The Director agreed that swales require special consideration and that staff will research plantings that preserve stormwater function. Public commenters echoed that point: resident David Denlow suggested contacting stormwater engineers and noted slowing stormwater can be beneficial, while Oliver Allison asked that the university be consulted on plant selection.
Alder Jackie Guthrie said the presentation addressed traffic-feasibility but not downtown vibrancy or short-term harm to businesses from major construction, and she suggested inviting the downtown business board into the conversation. The Director said staff will incorporate feedback, draft specific ordinance language and return to the board for further input.
Board members emphasized enforcement pragmatism and asked that proposed height and distance limits be easy for homeowners to understand. The board did not vote on an ordinance; staff will revise the proposal and solicit additional input.
