Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Special Education topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Rockport launches special-education program review and plans small in-district cohort for high-support students
Summary
The interim student-services lead announced a DESE-aligned program review (records, on-site observations and staff focus groups), relaunch of CPAC, and proposed a 3–5 student in-district cohort for K–2 students with severe needs to reduce out-of-district placements and better support inclusion.
The committee heard from the district’s interim student-services leader (introduced as Anne Marie) on implementation of DESE’s new IEP format, a contracted comprehensive program review, and steps to relaunch the special-education parent advisory council (CPAC).
Anne Marie said the district is implementing DESE’s new, more student-centered IEP template through eSped and is conducting a comprehensive program review that will include 26 randomly selected K–12 records, two on-site observation days in mid-January and staff focus groups; the consultant will deliver a culminating report and the district requested an earlier turnaround if possible.
On CPAC, the district reported 14 parents attended the first workshop and that leaders will formalize bylaws at the January meeting. Parents raised concerns about what 'inclusion' looks like locally and the geographic barriers families face when specialized programs are out of district.
To address out-of-district placement costs and improve local access, Anne Marie outlined a proposal to build a small in-district cohort (approximately 3–5 K–2 students) staffed by a teacher with severe-special-needs/ABA experience and paraprofessional support, backed by BCBA consultation and piloting of behavior-analysis software. She said current out-of-district tuition can range from roughly $116,000 to $168,000 per student annually, plus transportation, and that an in-district program could both serve students locally and reduce tuition expenditures.
Committee members asked about maintaining cohorts as students age, staff qualifications, and whether students out of district could return; Anne Marie said some could, but not immediately, and emphasized the goal of preventing future outflows by building capacity at home.
The committee did not take a formal vote; staff will use the program-review findings to refine options and return with recommendations.
