Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Noise Ordinance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Loveland residents and business owners press council for clear, enforceable downtown noise rules
Summary
Hundreds attended a Loveland City Council meeting where residents described recurring low-frequency bass and dozen-night amplified-music disruptions, while downtown business owners warned of economic harm from broad curfews; councilors referred the issue back to the Law & Ordinance committee with a July 22 public meeting planned.
Hundreds of residents and downtown business owners packed the Loveland City Council meeting to debate noise from outdoor live music, with speakers offering sharply different views and councilors saying they will continue work through the Law & Ordinance committee.
Business owner Ben Capadagli, who identified himself as owner of Cappy's Wine and Spirits, said recent police responses to noise complaints at his venue have been inconsistent and disruptive: “Where do we go from here?” he asked, urging the committee to act with urgency to provide “clear, consistent standards” so businesses and enforcement officers know what is permitted. Several downtown business owners, including Matt Powell, warned that early curfews or rigid decibel limits could reduce revenue and jobs, calling for targeted enforcement of existing rules rather than a broad shutdown of outdoor music.
Residents near downtown described the opposite problem. Kathleen Campion said amplified sound often reaches her back porch and has done so multiple nights per week, calling the effect a “loud nuisance” that has curtailed her family’s ability to use their property. Randy Campion and David Bishop described persistent low-frequency bass that they said regularly disturbs sleep and quiet enjoyment and argued that sound should be contained within the property line. Daniel C. Burton raised a separate, sharper complaint alleging improper police conduct in some enforcement encounters.
Council member Brian Goodyear, vice chair of the Law & Ordinance committee, told the room the committee has met twice and will hold a third public meeting on July 22 at 6 p.m. He said committee members are considering moving away from a strictly decibel-based standard toward a “reasonableness” standard that would be easier to apply and enforce in the field. City Manager Dave Kennedy and others said their aim is clarity and enforceability rather than eliminating outdoor music.
The council did not adopt a new ordinance at the meeting. Instead, members reiterated the process—committee drafting, further public input and subsequent council consideration—and invited residents and business owners to the July 22 meeting to offer feedback. The Law & Ordinance committee will next deliberate proposed language and enforcement options that could include season- and time-based provisions, containment strategies, and, under limited circumstances, decibel measurements as a backup enforcement tool.
For now, council members asked both sides to come to the committee meeting prepared to discuss specific, enforceable options, and they emphasized balancing downtown’s economic vitality with the rights of nearby homeowners to reasonable quiet enjoyment.
