Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Recovery Center topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Franklin County commissioners hear update on new recovery center, seek partnership draft

Franklin County Board of Commissioners · July 16, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Commissioners heard reports that the county's recovery center is operating and that county staff will seek a draft operating agreement from Comprehensive Health Care and Columbia Valley Center for Recovery to frame a possible partnership. Officials said the facility has served roughly 100 clients and listed 132 full-time staff; parts remain not fully operational.

Commissioners on the Franklin County Board heard updates July 15 on the county's recently opened recovery center and asked staff to draft a potential partnership agreement with local providers.

Commissioner Bauman said he met with corrections staff and the county chaplain and described "marked success" in a program overseen at the facility. Bauman said he had asked the CEO of Comprehensive Health Care and the mental health advisory board chair to provide a draft operating agreement modeled on a recent Benton County agreement so the board could evaluate a possible partnership.

Commissioner Dutier reported operational numbers and noted the center is "up and running." Dutier said county figures show the facility has served about 100 clients and that 132 full-time staff were listed for the period he described; he added that parts of the facility were not yet fully operational. He described a crisis-relief area that functions as a 23-hour sobering wing, reporting 47 total clients seen there and that 23 of those entered crisis stabilization.

The commissioners did not take formal action on the partnership at the meeting; Bauman said staff would circulate any draft agreement for the board to review. The board later entered an executive session on litigation and returned without public decisions.

What happened next: staff were asked to obtain and circulate the draft operating agreement from the providers for board review.