Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Technology And School Programs topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

USD 505 discusses e-rate-funded Wi‑Fi access point project; principals report student achievements and testing

Unified School District No. 505 Board of Education · January 1, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

District technology staff outlined a $22,000 access‑point project with e‑rate covering 80% of the cost. Principals from St. Paul and Chetopa reported recent student achievements, testing schedules and grant activity.

District technology staff reported plans to install wireless access points under an e-rate project estimated at $22,000, with e-rate expected to cover 80% of the cost.

Josh Brennon, listed in the meeting as district technology staff, described a smooth start to the second semester and said the e-rate project would cover most of the estimated $22,000 expense to install access points.

Principals Renee Gillard (St. Paul) and Jolene Hall (Chetopa) reported student activities and academic work. Gillard said students attended a Youth Entrepreneurship event, scholar bowl placed first at a recent contest, powerlifting participation went well, 18 students were adopted via an angel tree program, the Girard tournament performed well, and KESA goals and structured literacy efforts are ongoing. Hall reported that the Christmas program went well, Fastbridge testing was scheduled for the week, interim testing is upcoming, scholar bowl is set for Jan. 15, a 3-on-3 tournament is planned, basketball performance is improving, two students are wrestling for Chetopa on Feb. 21, the school is working with a PSU literacy grant, archery equipment is arriving, and the City of Chetopa has asked whether the district wishes to make use of a new drug dog.

The board did not take public action on the e-rate project during the meeting; next steps for procurement or installation were not specified in the minutes.