Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Mental Health Diversion topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Kankakee County resident urges stronger mental-health diversion partnerships
Summary
Michael Obadzinski told the county board that investing in comprehensive behavioral-health assessments and diversion programs could improve public safety, lower long-term costs and reduce repeat involvement with the criminal justice system.
Get email alerts on the Mental Health Diversion topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Michael Obadzinski, a Kankakee County resident, used the meeting's public-comment period to urge the county board to expand mental-health diversion efforts and strengthen partnerships among the courts, behavioral-health providers, probation, law enforcement and community organizations.
"Investing in effective mental health services can improve lives, reduce crime, lower long term costs and create a healthier, safer Kankakee for everyone," Obadzinski said, stressing that comprehensive behavioral-health assessment should guide treatment decisions rather than repeatedly cycling people through the criminal justice system. He said his appeal came from months of volunteer work, conversations at public meetings and personal experience with mental-health challenges.
Obadzinski recommended that the county continue conversations with the judiciary, the State's Attorney's Office, the public defender, treatment providers and other community partners to identify how diversion programs and supports could be strengthened. The chair thanked Obadzinski for his comment; the transcript records no formal motion or board directive in response during the meeting.
Context: Obadzinski framed his comments around public-safety and fiscal benefits, arguing that effective treatment and accountability can reduce repeat offenses and ease pressure on first responders and the criminal-justice system. The transcript does not record specific follow-up commitments by the board or staff at this meeting.
Next steps: Obadzinski suggested continued interagency discussion; any formal changes to county diversion policy or funding would require committee review and board action.

