Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Rental Permit Renewal topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

ZBA renews owner-occupied two-family special exception at 75 Oak Street

Village of Amityville Zoning Board of Appeals · May 21, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Zoning Board renewed a special-exception approval for an owner-occupied two-family dwelling at 75 Oak Street for one year (or until change of ownership) after the Building Inspector reported no life-safety issues and confirming adequate off-street parking. Approval was unanimous, with stipulations to secure a rental permit and schedule an inspection at the anniversary date.

The Village of Amityville Zoning Board of Appeals on May 21 renewed a previously approved special exception for an owner-occupied two-family dwelling at 75 Oak Street.

Edward Lanham spoke on behalf of the owner (Jose Sanchez) and described the unit configuration: a main floor with living room, dining room, kitchen, three bedrooms and a bathroom; upstairs houses three residents; lower level has living room, kitchen, two bedrooms and a bathroom with two residents. Building Inspector Michael Breitweg reported an inspection found no life-safety issues and confirmed adequate off-street parking for at least four cars.

The board approved the renewal by a 5–0 vote and issued the following stipulations: the approval is valid for the sooner of one year or change of ownership; the owner must secure a rental permit per Village Code; the owner must contact the Building Inspector to arrange an inspection at the anniversary date; maintain adequate off-street parking; and comply with all state and local codes. The vote was recorded for Chairperson Eric Taylor, Todd Brice, Timothy McManus, William Ordon and Joseph Ronzo.

The board noted the owner was working with the Village to resolve outstanding permits for work performed on the property. No public opposition was recorded during the hearing.