Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Project Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Developer says site-plan drawings are about 75% complete, tax-credit market may limit investor interest
Summary
A developer representative told the Hudson Housing Authority board the site's drawings are about 75% complete, the team aims for a December closing if state reviews proceed, and financing depends on competitive tax-credit syndication that can be challenging in smaller markets.
Get email alerts on the Project Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
A developer representative briefed the Hudson Housing Authority board on July 15 about progress on a townhouse-site project and the financing path the team is pursuing. The presenter said architectural drawings are roughly 75% complete and that the planning board will continue its review at a scheduled meeting; the project team plans to be ready to submit to state reviewers in the coming weeks.
On financing, the presenter explained the typical low-income housing tax credit (LIHTC) process: the federal government allocates tax credits to states, states assign credits to projects based on competitive applications, and developers typically sell their allocations to syndicators or institutional investors to raise equity. "The federal government allocates credits to each state in the country based on population," the presenter said, and then developers approach syndicators to determine how much each dollar of credit will fetch on the market.
The presenter warned that syndicators may be less willing to invest in smaller communities, saying some will not invest in towns that do not meet minimum deal sizes. He said market prices have fallen from earlier highs, affecting the amount of equity a developer can raise. The presenter said the team will reach out to syndicators over the next few weeks and report back to the authority on the level of market interest.
The presenter also described increased state energy-efficiency standards that will affect design decisions and advised the board the project is engaged in ongoing coordination with state sustainability reviewers and the architects. He said the team continues to target a December closing if state review and site testing allow that schedule to hold.
The board asked follow-up questions about tax-credit syndication and about how state sustainability requirements might affect cost and schedule; the presenter said these are part of the standard review and design process and that the project team expects to respond to state requests as they arise.

