Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Rezoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resident opposes mixed-residential zoning; applicant says apartment designation predates Deerfield plat
Summary
A public hearing opened on a rezoning that would keep the front of a lot single-family and designate the rear as mixed residential. Resident Joe Billie opposed the change over property-value and neighborhood character concerns; the applicant said the apartment zoning has existed since the Deerfield plat.
A public hearing opened on a proposed rezoning that would keep the front portion of a parcel as general single-family residential while rezoning the back half for mixed residential use, including apartments.
Joe Billie, a resident at 740 South, 130th, told the hearing he opposed the rezoning, saying, "I'm opposed to this for the same reason — property value. I've been there for 33 years, and now I'm gonna be surrounded by apartments." Billie said he raised three children at the property and expressed concern about the long-term impact on his property and neighborhood character.
The applicant's representative responded that the apartment designation for the rear tract existed when the Deerfield development plat was approved and that the request aligns the zoning with prior platting. The representative said the apartment tract (referred to as Tract A) has been in place for about 40 years and that the current application does not alter the front portion of the lot.
Chair (speaker S2) moved to open the public hearing, a motion that was seconded and the Chair declared the hearing open at 8:37 p.m. The Chair later called for a motion to close the hearing but paused to allow an additional participant to speak; the transcript ends before that process concluded.
A committee member asked the applicant for more specific plans for open space and detention areas, noting prior discussions with the applicant. The applicant did not provide detailed site plans in the available transcript; the committee member asked, "can you tell us at this time what your exact plans are for that?" The record in the transcript ends before the applicant's fuller response.
No formal vote on the rezoning appears in the available transcript. The public comment recorded in the excerpt was opposed to the rezoning on property-value grounds, while the applicant emphasized that the apartment zoning is preexisting and that the current filing primarily aligns zoning with the recorded plat.
