Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Regulatory Review topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
APRN committee to split five‑year statutory and regulatory reviews between March and June; KAR 60‑9‑106 sent back with minor edits
Summary
Committee members agreed to combine the statutory five‑year review with routine regulatory reviews, complete four items in March and four in June, and noted KAR 60‑9‑106 was returned a second time by the attorney general with minor changes that staff will address.
The APRN committee discussed how it will carry out the statutory five‑year review of statutes and regulations and announced a schedule to split the work between its March and June meetings.
A member walked the committee through the packet: the combined review process starts on page 16, the list of statutes and regulations to be reviewed in 2026 begins on page 18, and an example review form begins on page 19. Members agreed to have four items handled in March and the remaining four in June; staff will include copies of each statute or regulation in the packet together with one completed review sheet for each item.
Separately, the committee heard that KAR 60‑9‑106 had been returned by the attorney general's office for a second review with a few minor changes after having previously cleared that office. Committee staff said they will make the requested edits and return the regulation to the attorney general's office for consideration.
Why it matters: The five‑year review is a legislatively required housekeeping process that keeps statutes and regulations current and responsive to practice changes. The KAR 60‑9‑106 re‑submission affects rule text already under internal review and requires staff follow‑up.
Next steps: Staff will update the committee in March with attorney general comments and will prepare the identified packet materials for the March and June reviews.
