Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Short Term Rentals topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bonner Springs council sends short‑term rental rules back to planning after debate over downtown limits
Summary
After more than two hours of questions and public comment, the Bonner Springs City Council voted to remand a proposed short‑term rental ordinance to the planning commission to rework downtown spacing and inventory limits, leaving a one‑year pilot and a 1,000‑foot spacing proposal for further review.
Get email alerts on the Short Term Rentals topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bonner Springs’ City Council voted to send a proposed amendment to the city’s Unified Development Ordinance on short‑term rentals back to the planning commission for revisions after extended debate over how a downtown cap and a 1,000‑foot spacing rule would affect scarce rental housing.
The amendment, presented by Community Development Director Mark Lee, would add conditional‑use standards and a spacing rule intended to limit concentration of short‑term rentals in residential areas. Lee said staff modeled the draft on rules used in neighboring municipalities and intended a one‑year pilot to let the city monitor impacts before tightening or loosening rules.
The council heard a public comment from Karen Kipp, a Bonner Springs resident and local rental property owner, who said a 1,000‑foot spacing requirement is too large for Bonner Springs’ compact downtown and urged a shorter distance—“maybe 300, 350, or 500 feet”—to avoid effectively limiting the number of downtown short‑term units to one per several blocks.
“Kansas City‑area blocks average about 300 feet,” Kipp said. “A thousand feet would be literally three blocks in any direction and would potentially mean only one license per three‑square‑block area.”
Council members framed the debate as a balance between promoting downtown tourism and protecting long‑term housing. Several councilmembers noted downtown reportedly has fewer than 15 residential units that could qualify for short‑term rental use, and warned that a permissive rule could displace housing stock. Other councilmembers argued the city currently has effectively no regulation and that a cautious pilot—starting with 1,000 feet and then adjusting—would prevent rapid, hard‑to‑reverse change.
Council discussion also covered enforcement and consumer‑protection measures in the draft ordinance. Staff and other speakers said transient guest tax (TGT) applies to stays under 28 days and that booking platforms typically collect and remit TGT to the state; the draft would require proof of insurance and registration with a booking agency to provide some liability protections for owners and renters.
After debate and a failed motion to adopt the ordinance (the initial motion lacked a second), Councilmember Emily Blanks moved—and a colleague seconded—to remand the item to planning and zoning to specifically revisit Section 4, line items a and b (the downtown block‑face cap and the citywide spacing/density limits). The motion passed on roll call with six in favor and two opposed.
What happens next: Planning and zoning will review downtown inventory and spacing options and return a revised proposal to the council. Staff framed the current approach as a starting point: “We can start with 1,000 feet and reduce it if the pilot shows a smaller distance would be appropriate,” Mark Lee said. Councilmembers said they want the commission to consider either a smaller footage or a percentage‑of‑inventory approach tailored to the actual number of qualifying downtown residential units.
The council’s action leaves no immediate changes in zoning; without an ordinance in place, short‑term rentals remain unregulated in Bonner Springs, the council noted. The remand is intended to produce a narrower downtown approach that protects housing while allowing a limited pilot for short‑term rentals to proceed under clearer guardrails.

