Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Impaired Provider Program topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public commenter urges review of impaired‑provider program and warns of pending statute changes
Summary
Terry Roberts, a public commenter, urged the investigative committee to scrutinize the impaired‑provider program, said she could not obtain the current KNAB contract, and warned that recently proposed statutory language could remove current board members; the chair said the topic requires separate follow‑up.
Terry Roberts addressed the investigative committee during the public‑comment period, saying she had requested a copy of the contract used by licensees who enter the KNAB program but had not received it. Roberts said she has followed the impaired‑provider program and the relevant statute (noted in the record as 65‑49‑25) since the 1986 mandatory‑reporting changes and described concerns about how program policy and contract terms have evolved.
Roberts told the committee she learned of pending legislative language (she referenced bills she identified as 2528 and 2532) that, in her description, would bar agency retaliation against licensees and could result in all current board members being off the board around an April effective date. She urged the committee to explain the intent behind a provision she said delegates impaired‑provider program oversight to the board and asked whether the board intended to run that program directly.
Adri Goldsmith, who presided over the meeting, thanked Roberts for her advocacy and said the point was beyond the scope of the day’s discussion; Goldsmith said the committee had documented Roberts’s comments and would address them outside the limited time available. The chair reiterated appreciation for Roberts’s work and the committee’s history of engagement with nursing stakeholders.
Why it matters: Roberts raised both process and policy questions—access to contract terms for a program that handles impaired providers, and the implications of recent legislative language for board composition and oversight. The committee recorded the public comment and listed the matter for further attention, but did not take formal action during the meeting.
What’s next: The committee plans follow‑up work on legislative review (tabled until June) and related program oversight; staff and members indicated they would document Roberts’s concerns and return with additional information.
