Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Athletics Coop topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Trustees debate RePoint request to co‑op boys soccer; board asks for coaches and AD at next discussion
Summary
District staff briefed trustees on a request from RePoint to co‑op boys soccer (paperwork to MHSA would be completed for possible fall 2027 participation). Trustees debated fairness to in‑district students, 8th‑grader movement to high school teams, and JV opportunities; board asked staff to return the item as an action item in September with coaches present.
District administrators presented a request from RePoint to enter a cooperative boys soccer arrangement with Laurel Schools. Staff said two RePoint students who already play in community programs have expressed interest; if the board supports a co‑op the athletic director (Andrew, as referenced) would complete paperwork for the Montana High School Association and the earliest practical start would be fall 2027.
Board members debated priorities and competitive fairness. Several trustees emphasized preference for Laurel students and that in‑district students should have priority for roster spots. The chair reiterated that the district will not cut a Laurel student to make room for an out‑of‑district 8th grader and that Laurel middle‑school students and Laurel high‑school students would take precedence. One trustee framed the co‑op as an opportunity to field JV teams and expand playing time: co‑op students could help grow a JV schedule and provide developmental playing time for in‑district athletes. Another trustee said the board could limit co‑op approvals to high‑school–level players and avoid including 8th graders.
Staff and trustees agreed to put the matter on a future agenda as an action item (discussed for September) and requested that coaches and the athletic director attend so the board has numeric roster projections and coach input before taking a vote. The board did not take formal action at this meeting; members said they were open to discussion but wanted additional detail before deciding.
