Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Accountability topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents press council on $5.75M tax-incentive vote and allege improper juvenile police custody
Summary
Two public commenters urged scrutiny of city decision-making: Susie Smith asked the council to explain and reconsider a June vote committing $5.75 million in sales-tax incentives to Delaney Property Group, while another resident alleged her son was unlawfully taken into custody by Tuscaloosa police and asked for follow-up from public-safety officials.
In the citizen-comment period the council heard two extended public comments raising accountability concerns.
Susie Smith (gave Springbrook address) criticized a June 16 council vote that she said committed $5,750,000 of city sales-tax revenue to Delaney Property Group for a private development in the Springbrook neighborhood. She told the council that the June vote was 4–2 and named councilors who voted for and against the resolution, said planning professionals and petition signers had opposed the project, and urged the council to "state now the reason for your vote" and to reconsider the resolution under the council's rules. "I ask that you state now the reason for your vote on the tax incentive resolution," she said.
Later a resident who identified an address at "3 Washington Square" described an incident on July 11 in which her teenage son, she said, was unlawfully placed into police custody by Tuscaloosa Police Department officers. The resident said her son was handcuffed, placed in the back of a police vehicle, questioned without the opportunity to contact a parent, and not read juvenile Miranda rights; she also said officers refused to give identifying information. "My son was placed in handcuffs and placed in the back of the police vehicle," she said, and "they did not read him his juvenile Miranda rights." She said Major Rester later told her the suspect description was black pants and white shoes and called the event a "learning experience" for officers; she told the council she found that response unacceptable.
The mayor noted the executive director of public safety was present and said that official would be glad to follow up; Miss Howard, who identified herself as chair of public safety, said she would speak with the director to "figure out exactly what happened." No formal votes or disciplinary actions were taken at the meeting; both matters were presented as citizen requests for explanation and follow-up.
