Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Wastewater topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
District highlights WRF permitting progress, flags multi‑million-dollar waterline, brine disposal and funding challenges
Summary
Staff reported recent planning commission success on the wastewater recycling facility but warned that effluent conveyance, brine disposal and the San Simeon waterline could cost millions; board asked for feasibility studies, grant pursuit and careful sequencing.
Get email alerts on the Wastewater topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
General Manager Matthew McElhinney told the board the district’s wastewater portfolio is a priority because failures compound quickly: "If wastewater fails during storms, public health risk rises," he said, framing WRF permitting as central to long-term water management and public-safety goals.
Staff reported a planning-commission approval step for the WRF and said the next appeals and Coastal Commission review were likely. The district is pursuing options for brine disposal, including zero-liquid-discharge (ZLD) technologies, trucking, and a potential San Simeon outfall; staff recommended a cost-and-feasibility study and bringing identified options to the board rather than locking into a single approach.
On liquid-effluent conveyance, engineers and staff said the permanent effluent line to San Simeon is now estimated in the multi‑million-dollar range (discussed in the meeting as $5–6 million) because alignments and regulatory constraints increase complexity. That project was tentatively sequenced for construction in 2027–2028 but remains contingent on grant success and a potential Prop 218 financing strategy. The board directed staff to proceed with a water-master-plan update, pursue grants and prepare a Prop 218 timeline if needed.
The board also received an update on the Stewart Street tanks: staff said the first tank would be disinfected and commissioned within weeks and both tanks are targeted online by August—timing officials said is critical for the fire season and fire-flow capacity.
Next steps: staff will complete feasibility and cost studies for brine disposal and the effluent line, pursue grant funding and return with specific financing options for the board to consider.

