Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Water Supply topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission hears regional water-supply update as drought tightens
Summary
Commissioners reviewed a draft regional water-supply plan and described local drought effects and anecdotal well failures at the July 16 meeting; staff will share the consultant's draft when complete but no formal action was taken because a quorum was not present.
The Northumberland County Planning Commission discussed an updated regional water-supply plan and local drought impacts at its July 16 meeting, but took no formal action because a quorum was not present.
A commissioner on the panel said the regional plan — prepared jointly with other Northern Neck counties — is being updated and that the consultant asked the county to verify active wells and provide data on large self-supplied users and community water systems. "The water supply plan has to be updated, I think, every 5 years," the commissioner said, and added that they had contacted roughly 14 entities and received responses from about a third.
The report, the commissioner said, will be shared with the commission when the consultant finishes the draft; the commission or county board will need to approve the plan as it moves forward. The commissioner noted regulatory constraints, saying only the Department of Environmental Quality or the Department of Health could impose other withdrawal limitations beyond standard permits.
Several members described drought conditions and local impacts on wells. The reporting commissioner said the region is about "10 inches below rainfall" and that recharge of shallow aquifers mainly occurs in fall and winter when trees are leafless; they also said they had anecdotal reports of well failures and had observed well-service trucks in the county. When asked if this was the worst drought in memory, a commissioner referenced 2002 as the last major comparable event.
Commissioners also discussed the limits of county authority to provide centralized water to a largely dispersed rural population, noting that building a countywide water supply would be costly and logistically difficult. Desalination was mentioned as technically possible but energy-intensive.
Because fewer than the required six members were present, the commission could only discuss the plan informally; any formal recommendation or public hearing will await a future meeting or county-board action.
