Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Recreation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Boyne City approves one-year alpine touring pilot at Avalanche Preserve with environmental safeguards

Boyne City Commission · July 16, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission approved a one-year pilot allowing designated alpine touring corridors on the Avalanche Preserve, with limited thinning and a one-year Parks & Rec review to assess environmental impact and user conflicts.

Boyne City commissioners approved a one-year pilot allowing the Michigan Backcountry Alliance to develop designated alpine touring corridors in the Avalanche Preserve, with parks staff responsible for coordinating corridor locations and vegetative management.

Parks staff and an Alliance representative said the proposal emphasizes low-impact use: volunteers would do limited thinning and stockpile deadfall, and ‘‘no chainsaws, cutting down mature trees or anything like that’’ would be used, the representative said. The plan anticipates thinning roughly 10% of the mapped area in the first winter and tapering corridor widths to prevent conflicts with hiking or snowshoe trails.

Commissioners questioned corridor widths (described as a rough guideline of 30 to 60 feet), how skiers and snowboarders would be prevented from crossing high-speed hiking trails, and the number of saplings that might need removal. The Alliance representative said corridors would taper toward trails and include barriers to force users to stop and remove gear before returning to hiking paths.

Supporters, including the parks liaison and several commissioners, argued the pilot would organize an activity that already occurs informally and could provide winter recreation opportunities for locals, particularly young people. The motion required coordination and a one-year review by the Parks & Recreation Commission; a roll call vote recorded unanimous support.