Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Transportation Infrastructure topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

County presents plan to rebuild dangerous CSAH 3/36/CR 103 intersection; Crosslake wants cost details

City Council, City of Crosslake · June 8, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Crow Wing County presented a preliminary design and schedule for a 2028 reconstruction of the CSAH 3/CSAH 36/CR 103 intersection to address multiple fatal crashes; the City Council held questions about cost‑sharing and deferred a support resolution until funding details are clarified.

Crow Wing County staff outlined plans for a major reconstruction of the CSAH 3/CSAH 36/CR 103 intersection during the Crosslake City Council meeting on June 8.

Daria Graupman, Crow Wing County staff engineer, told the council the project is intended to improve safety after numerous fatal accidents at the intersection. Graupman said the county is considering detour routes that would route local traffic onto Antler Road and Gendreau Road and use County Roads 11, 16, and 39 for commercial traffic during construction. Estimated construction is 8–12 weeks in the summer of 2028.

Council members said they were not prepared to adopt a supporting resolution included in the meeting packet until the county provides more information about cost-sharing and funding sources. Mayor Jackson Purfeerst and other council members asked staff to return with additional fiscal details before the council takes a formal position.

A county public information meeting is scheduled for Monday, July 13, at 5 p.m. at Crosslake City Hall, Graupman said. The county presentation and the council’s request for detailed funding information leave the timeline for council endorsement open; no formal council motion adopting support was recorded at the June 8 meeting.

Next steps: county staff will provide project cost estimates and proposed cost‑share terms for council review ahead of the public information meeting and any formal council action.