Board tables decision on Mammoth '3 60' partnership after presentation, asks for more pricing and booster input

The Smithville R‑II board heard a presentation from Mammoth representatives about a proposed "3 60" partnership that would offer design, creative/marketing and eight‑year maintenance options for athletic fields at partner pricing.

Nick Stringer, introduced by district staff as part of Mammoth’s project team, described partner services including maintenance plans, creative media (hype and facility videos) and facility design support. "We are about as proud as we could be to be selected by you guys to build this facility," Stringer said, describing an 8‑year maintenance program for fields and reduced partner rates on services such as annual field maintenance and promotional videos.

Board members asked detailed questions about partner pricing, the effect on boosters and sponsors, donation practices, and whether engaging Mammoth for pre‑bid work would influence future competitive bids. One board member noted the district’s prior experience with price variance between conceptual estimates and actual bids and requested clearer budget ranges and comparisons to standard market pricing.

A motion to approve the Mammoth Sports Construction "3 60" partnership was made and seconded on the floor; a board member then amended the motion to table the decision until the next meeting to allow more information and booster outreach. The board voted to table the item; board members named on the record as the original mover and seconder were Patrick and Brooke. The meeting minutes recorded: "Motion carries to move it to next month."

District staff said Mammoth can provide detailed partner‑pricing breakdowns and that the board would be given follow‑up information and an opportunity to consult with coaches and boosters before the next meeting.