Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Charter Schools topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves two public charter schools, denies five others after committee review
Summary
The Montana Board of Public Education on Jan. 16 approved resolutions granting charters to Stevensville Health Sciences Academy and Park Pathways School and voted to deny five other applications after the charter committee’s recommendations; members asked staff to clarify and communicate denial rationales to applicants.
Get email alerts on the Charter Schools topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Montana Board of Public Education on Jan. 16 approved resolutions to grant charters to Stevensville Health Sciences Academy and Park Pathways School and separately voted to deny five other applications, following recommendations from the board’s charter school committee.
The board’s executive director displayed the approval resolution and the chair called for a motion; the motion to approve the two applications was moved and seconded and carried after a voice vote. Executive Director Flynn said the approvals reflected the committee’s recommendations. Livingston district representative Chad Johnson, in public comment, thanked the board for the thorough conversation and said the process had been reflective and helpful.
The board then considered a separate denial resolution. Executive Director Flynn said the denial resolution requires the board to state a rationale for each denied application based on the packet criteria. The board approved denial of applications for Custer County Class Academy; Stevensville Alternative Steps Charter School; Lions Path Academy; Soar Academy; and Columbia Falls Trade Academy. Several board members said the denials were made according to the committee’s scoring rubric and packet criteria and urged staff to ensure the reasons were communicated clearly to applicants.
Board members repeatedly raised the need to clarify what the board means by “innovative” so applicants can better target future proposals. Member Neeskin urged a future work session to define “innovative,” and others said clearer written guidance and timely feedback would help applicants and avoid wasted effort.
No roll‑call tallies were recorded in the transcript of the voice votes; the minutes record the motions as carried.
The board’s actions were taken during agenda item 22; staff said the resolutions would be finalized and filed per board procedures.

