Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Council Actions topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Votes at a glance: council approves minutes, utility collections, personnel update and claims; other items tabled

Choteau City Council · August 20, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At the Aug. 20 meeting the council approved Aug. 6 minutes (with correction), voted to place delinquent water/garbage charges on property tax bills, adopted a personnel policy correction on sick‑leave transfer, approved payment of claims, approved the senior‑class Waterworks use request, and tabled a floodplain engineering approval pending county input.

The Choteau City Council on Aug. 20 recorded a series of routine votes and one tabled item:

- Approval of minutes (Aug. 6): Motion made and carried after a member requested a textual correction clarifying a conversation with the fire department.

- Delinquent utility charges on tax roll: Council approved placing delinquent water and garbage charges (typically accounts 90+ days past due) on property tax bills that will be included with the October tax statements; staff said this is an annual process affecting a small number of accounts.

- Personnel policy update (sick‑leave use/transfer): Council approved a clarification to the personnel policy to align language with commonly used municipal practice and to remove an ambiguous annual phrase.

- Claims and bills: Council approved payment of the claims presented; members asked about line items including fuel and tires for the sewer plant.

- Waterworks building use for senior class car wash: Council approved the senior class request for a Sept. 1 fundraiser.

- Floodplain engineering approval (item 4): Council tabled the proposed contract for compaction/elevation verification on two lots pending conversation with county commissioners; the motion was made and carried by voice vote.

Most votes were taken by voice and recorded in the meeting as carried by unanimous or majority voice votes; no roll‑call tallies were recorded in the transcript.