Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Municipal Governance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Votes at a glance: Easly City advances franchise, peddler rules and several annexations

Easly City Council · July 14, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council approved a second reading franchise agreement with a regional fiber provider, advanced a peddler ordinance, and moved multiple annexations and incentive agreements for further reading; votes were by voice and items will return for additional review.

Easly City Council recorded the following procedural outcomes and votes Monday (voice votes unless noted):

- Ordinance 20-26-17 (franchise agreement with Wired 3/Wire3 fiber ISP): motion to accept passed with no opposition after a company presentation on local service and construction notice plans.

- Ordinance 20-26-19 (add chapter 123 for solicitors, canvassers and peddlers): first reading held; council voted to advance the ordinance and directed staff to prepare agreed amendments between first and second reading.

- Ordinance 20-26-20 (annex ~13.16 acres, Latham Road LLC; office/institutional zoning for proposed charter school): advanced for further review and public input.

- Ordinance 20-26-21 (mobile food vendors amendment): first reading advanced; council agreed to refine amendments (add beverages, revise agency oversight from DHEC to Department of Agriculture, change local official responsibility) before second reading.

- Ordinances 20-26-22 and 20-26-23 (Freeman Real Estate LLC annexations totaling ~15.827 acres; designate GC): both accepted and advanced for additional review.

- Ordinance 20-26-24 (rezone ~17.05 acres from residential to GC): accepted and advanced.

- Ordinance 20-26-25 (incentive agreement with R.T. Calhoun Memorial LLC): accepted and advanced; council debated incentives, FOIA-related provisions and a clause referencing the city’s consideration of eminent domain for access rights.

Several motions were advanced by voice vote with no recorded roll-call tallies in the transcript. Council asked staff to return with further traffic, fiscal and contract-language clarifications prior to final readings.