Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Procurement And Votes topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Mahoning County commissioners approve routine contracts, change orders and awards

Mahoning County Commissioners · July 16, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At the July 16 meeting commissioners approved minutes, multiple contracts for chip-rehab work, several small change orders, and awards for paving and waste services; roll-call votes were recorded for the presented motions.

The Mahoning County commissioners approved routine administrative items and several procurement actions during their July 16 meeting in Youngstown.

Motions to approve the previous minutes, bills to pay and journal entry number 1 passed by roll call. The board approved four agreements for chip-rehab work at specific addresses with contract amounts listed by staff: Gary, Inc. for $76,335; Holland Company for $23,000; Prime Carpentry LLC for $72,239; and ALJ Construction for $64,825. Change orders and amendments for lead/healthy-homes work and other rehab projects were also approved in smaller amounts (examples cited by staff included $1,560, $505, $765 and $2,200).

Resolutions of awards approved by the board included a sales-tax paving-related award listed at $344,503.85 and an award for town waste/renewable services to Ohio Valley Waste Inc. at $205,850; staff described these as the lowest responsive bids in the relevant procurement categories. The board also approved record-of-bids items for wastewater electrical upgrades (Craig Beach) and a skid upgrade for the Mahoning County Metro Sewer District.

A personnel resolution to appoint a general maintenance worker was presented and adopted. Commissioners conducted roll-call votes on the listed items; staff and department heads presented project and contract details before votes. No controversial or contested procurements were recorded in the transcript; the items were presented as part of routine business.