Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Downtown Partnership topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Crescent City commissioners press downtown partnership for clearer KPIs and board changes
Summary
At a June 9 workshop, Crescent City commissioners pressed the Crescent City Downtown Partnership and Main Street interim director for measurable goals, clearer board composition, and a funding plan, while a state Main Street adviser urged realistic deliverables and a multi-year approach.
Crescent City commissioners on June 9 convened a workshop with the Crescent City Downtown Partnership and CRA staff to push the partnership toward clearer performance metrics, board reorganization and a sustainable funding plan.
The partnership's interim director told the commission the group had addressed several administrative problems on her watch: "We were not in compliance with the Department of Agriculture. We were not in compliance with our sales tax and, some insurance expired," she said, adding that finances and QuickBooks have been straightened out and that the partnership will provide full-year reports at the next meeting.
The main aim of the session was to update the Memorandum of Understanding between the city and the downtown partnership so the commission can measure whether public funding is delivering results. A Main Street adviser recommended explicit deliverables for the program's four core functions — organization, design, promotion, economic vitality — and urged the commission to set reasonable targets tied to the CRA plan and available grants.
"A 3rd should come from the local governmental partner, a 3rd from grants, and a 3rd from their own fundraising efforts," the adviser said, and that fundraising typically strengthens after a program reaches years five to seven. She emphasized that Main Street is a long-term, roughly 10-year, revitalization process and cautioned against short-term expectations.
Commissioners pressed for a simple, auditable "report card" in the MOU. One staff member who has drafted KPI language recommended six high-level categories: economic vitality (new businesses, vacancy reduction, private investment leveraged), promotion and marketing (events, social reach), design and placemaking (facade/beautification projects), organization and governance (board attendance, volunteer hours, fiscal compliance), community engagement, and safety/experience (district ambassadors, lighting improvements).
Several commissioners said the partnership's bylaws should be reworked to widen board membership beyond nonprofit presidents and to include business owners, property owners and residents so the governing group better reflects the community the partnership serves. The Main Street adviser and CRA staff agreed that a nonvoting city liaison is appropriate but warned commissioners against serving as voting board members on an independent 501(c)(3).
Commissioners and staff also discussed staffing: the adviser recommended a full-time director for consistent outreach and partnership building but acknowledged that a part-time director could be acceptable depending on local funding. The mayor asked the partnership to review whether an annex or shared office could reduce costs while the partnership determines the appropriate executive role.
Public comment included the downtown partnership's treasurer, who described recent bookkeeping clean-up and a newly formed economic vitality committee that will survey merchants and tailor trainings and incubator supports to local needs.
The commission did not adopt changes at the workshop; instead staff and the partnership will return with revised bylaws, a proposed KPI/reporting schedule for the MOU and a recommendation on whether a full-time director or a part-time executive best suits the city's budget.
