Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Ifgid Audit topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Residents, auditors and state staff press Incline Village GID over forensic audit, prompting subcommittee review

Committee on Local Government Finance · October 24, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

State staff and IFGID officials outlined a forensic review that found 41 internal-control weaknesses and unreconciled bank accounts; residents urged the committee to place IFGID on fiscal watch and the committee appointed a subcommittee to review remediation and finances.

The Committee on Local Government Finance heard extensive public comment and a departmental briefing on the Incline Village General Improvement District’s (IFGID) recent forensic audit, internal-control failures and bank reconciliation problems, and appointed a subcommittee to work with district staff to monitor corrective action.

Department budget analyst Kelly Grammon (assigned to Incline Village) told the committee staff found a denied augmentation (01/31/2024), a failed Tyler ERP transition, and a forensic due-diligence report that identified 41 internal-control weaknesses (16 high risk, 12 moderate, 13 low). Grammon said the district’s FY2023 audit was issued with no opinion under NRS 354.624 and that the department had sent a corrective-action letter. She said the Davis Pharr audit team will perform an additional 70 hours of testing and the department has been working almost weekly with interim staff to address problems.

Interim general manager Karen Crocker said staff have requested Reuben Brown’s work papers so they can better understand the 41 observations and described immediate steps: legal demands for work papers, increased auditing, implementation of staff logins and updated procurement-card oversight, and a Tyler addendum the board approved on Oct. 9 to fix integration issues. "We are going to be implementing [Tyler] ASAP," Crocker said, and added staff had begun making procedural changes to address high-risk items.

Interim director of finance Susan Griffith told the committee the fiscal 2024 audit field work had begun and auditors were on site the following week. Griffith said staff had produced updated bank-reconciliation summaries and that reconciliation work remains incomplete for some months because of understaffing; she estimated additional reconciled items of about $1,200,000 for June and $31,000 for May and told members the fund balance may show an overexpenditure of "approximately $2,000,000." Audit partner Jennifer Farr said if documentation continues to be provided on time, auditors expect a draft report in early December.

Residents testified at length. Clifford Dobler, a retired CPA and long-time IFGID critic, said he had filed dozens of memorandums about accounting irregularities and listed specific alleged problems including unreconciled bank statements, contract and statutory violations, improperly capitalized expenses and loan advances from the general fund. "Only now is the staff ready to review them," Dobler said, and he urged the committee to enforce the NRS provisions governing audits and fiscal oversight. Michael Abel, a property owner, cited five examples he said show mismanagement and urged the committee to declare a "severe financial emergency" and place IFGID on fiscal watch pursuant to NRS 354.675. Several other residents called the district’s facility fee effectively a tax and asked the Department to examine and, if appropriate, seek statutory changes.

Committee Chair Levitt appointed a subcommittee to work with district staff and report back: Dean Rackley, Jeffrey Sher, and Member Foley agreed to serve. The chair asked that IFGID staff be cooperative and provide requested materials so the subcommittee can recommend whether the department should place the district on fiscal watch or take other actions.

What happens next: the subcommittee will work with IFGID staff and the department; department auditors will complete additional testing and the district’s fiscal-2024 audit schedule will determine when an opinion is issued and whether corrective actions eliminate statutory concerns.