Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Subdivision topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Zoning board approves subdivision and new single‑family home at 19 Sansom St.; vote 4–1

Brockton Zoning Board of Appeals · July 15, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Zoning Board granted a variance to subdivide 19 Sansom St. and allow construction of a new single‑family dwelling (the "Gormley House"). The board noted concerns about rear setbacks and plan details but found the proposed lots consistent with neighborhood patterns; final vote 4–1.

The Brockton Zoning Board of Appeals voted to grant relief that allows subdivision of 19 Sansom St. into two lots and construction of a new single‑family residence described in filings as the "Gormley House."

Attorney Jim Burke, appearing for the applicant, said the original parcel contains a preexisting nonconforming structure and argued the lot’s size and shape make subdivision a reasonable use. Burke identified the applicant in filings as Aileen Carrera and said he represents Aileen Perea, who was present. He said the planning board previously granted definitive subdivision approval and that each finished lot would be about 5,441 square feet.

Applicants’ representatives noted the proposed new home is a two‑story, four‑bedroom design with a small footprint intended to align with neighboring houses. Board members questioned plan details: the site plan did not show a deck and doghouse that appear on the building plans, and the chair noted the proposed rear setback could leave the new deck only 10–11 feet from an adjacent house. The board asked for clarity about the backyard configuration and alignment with neighboring building lines.

Several elected officials and community representatives spoke in favor, with one councilor and local community association members saying the single‑family build would improve the block and that the owner plans to live in the home. Supporters framed the project as quality infill rather than rental housing or an ADU conversion.

After deliberation a motion to grant was made and seconded. The clerk’s roll call produced four affirmative votes and one negative; the chair announced the petition granted. The board recorded concerns about rear setback proximity and noted plan inconsistencies to be resolved in permitting.