Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Noise Ordinance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council halts noise-ordinance rewrite after riverfront complaints, asks police to weigh in
Summary
Council discussed tightening noise rules after residents raised riverfront complaints, debated decibel thresholds and enforcement constraints, and agreed to consult police and model ordinances from other cities before returning the item to committee.
Council members discussed possible revisions to the city’s noise ordinance on July 14 after residents raised concerns about loud music and events along the riverfront. Members and residents said the existing ordinance—tied to health and ‘disturbing the peace’—is vague and hard to enforce in practice.
"Noise bounces a lot off water," said a council member, noting that residents who live near the river can hear sound from considerable distances. Council members discussed whether to include explicit decibel thresholds, to vary limits by area (for example, tolerances near established bars versus quiet residential riverfront blocks), and whether the city has or should invest in decibel meters for enforcement.
Several council members said enforcement is a practical hurdle. The police department was not present at the meeting; the chair recommended inviting the police chief or a police representative to the next meeting so council could hear enforcement perspectives and calibration requirements for any proposed decibel standard.
The committee left the item in committee and asked the law director to collect examples from other municipalities and return with sample language. Residents who spoke during the public-recognition period were also noted as having raised concerns about events on the river.
Next steps: law director to prepare examples of decibel-based language used elsewhere and the council will invite a police representative to advise on enforcement and equipment calibration.
