Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Cherry Point Rezoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Beaufort County committee postpones Cherry Point rezoning after residents cite traffic, wetlands and water-quality concerns
Summary
Committee members heard sustained public opposition to a Cherry Point rezoning and voted 4–2 to postpone consideration after the applicant asked for more time for a traffic engineer to review plans; residents warned of wetlands filling, runoff into the Okeetee River and inadequate local infrastructure.
Public commenters urged the Natural Resources Committee to delay or reject a rezoning in the Cherry Point area, saying the proposal increased density and threatened local waterways and road safety.
Several residents said they had rescinded earlier support after plans changed. "You're gonna have lots of wildlife displaced and or killed," a resident told the committee, warning that stormwater runoff would further harm the Okeetee River. Derek Seater, who identified himself as living at 169 Cherry Point Road, said the county's infrastructure is not keeping pace with growth and urged the committee to vote no.
The committee deferred the matter after the applicant requested additional time for its traffic engineer to review the plan. The committee voted 4–2 to postpone the item to the next meeting and asked that the applicant submit the request in writing for the record.
Why it matters: Residents and speakers said the increased density would exacerbate traffic problems on South Carolina 170, threaten wetlands and complicate future decisions about school siting. The planning commission had previously expressed reservations; one public commenter said the planning commission had unanimously voted against the rezoning.
What was said: Community speakers raised several recurring points: the potential for wetlands to be filled if a 30-acre middle-school parcel is bisected by wetlands; observed water-quality problems at the Cherry Point test station (described by a speaker as "above 15 parts per million" over years); and a belief that previous approvals increased local density without adequate infrastructure investments.
What the committee did: After hearing public comment and a late written request from the applicant for more traffic analysis, the committee approved a motion to postpone the Cherry Point rezoning to the next meeting by a 4–2 vote and requested that the applicant submit supporting materials for the record.
Next steps: The applicant is expected to provide the traffic-engineering review and a formal written request to be included in the meeting record; the item will be placed on a future Natural Resources Committee agenda for further consideration.
