Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ambassador Program topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
San Antonio briefs committee on Ambassador internship program; council presses to expand to opportunity youth
Summary
The city’s Department of Human Services described the Ambassador summer internship — $838,000 in DHS funding, $18/hour stipends and roughly 200 funded slots — and committee members asked staff for employer lists, alumni tracking and a proposal to pilot the program for opportunity youth.
At a March 17 Education Opportunities Committee meeting, Rebecca, a division representative from the Department of Human Services, gave a detailed briefing on the city’s Ambassador summer internship program and its outcomes.
Rebecca said the Ambassador program, launched in 2004 to help reverse San Antonio’s “brain drain,” targets San Antonio‑area high‑school graduates who are enrolled full time in college (after at least one year of study) and who meet a 2.5 GPA and residency requirements. The program budget was cited at $838,000 and includes stipends of $18 per hour; interns may work up to 30 hours a week in most cases. Rebecca said the city funds roughly 200 ambassador slots and that recent recruitments drew roughly 900–1,100 applications for those openings.
"We provide $18 an hour," Rebecca said, and noted staff spend significant time matching interns to employer placements and helping with background checks, onboarding and case management.
Committee members praised the program’s outcomes and encouraged expansion. Council member Castillo and other members noted alumni and supervisor survey results Rebecca cited (for example, large shares of ambassadors reported improved career awareness after the placement) and urged staff to produce disaggregated data showing which council districts and demographic groups are applying and being accepted.
Council members also proposed piloting an "opportunity youth" stream — an adaptation of the Ambassador model to serve young people not currently enrolled in college or those involved with juvenile or municipal court systems. Rebecca responded that the city has existing employer partnerships and noted the program already includes a waiver process for students with housing instability; she agreed to share the employer partner list with the committee and to follow up on metrics about repeat ambassadors and alumni retention.
Committee requests and next steps include: staff will provide the committee with an employer partner list on request; staff will pursue further alumni tracking and district‑level participation breakdowns; and council members signaled interest in a follow‑up proposal outlining costs and an operational model to pilot an opportunity‑youth adaptation.
The committee did not take a formal vote on program expansion during the briefing; members requested additional data and cost estimates before any action.
