Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Bicycle Pedestrian Plan topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Marinette council approves Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan 2026 after split votes

City of Marinette Common Council · July 7, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After public comment opposing the proposal, the Marinette Common Council voted 6–2 to approve the Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan 2026 following presentations from Mead & Hunt and two competing motions to send the plan back for revisions and to adopt it as presented.

The Marinette Common Council voted 6–2 on July 7, 2026 to adopt the City of Marinette Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Plan 2026 after debate and public comment.

Mead & Hunt representatives Brian Carranza, planner and landscape architect, and Molly North, transportation engineer, explained the plan’s recommendations to the council and answered members’ questions during the old-business item. Earlier in the meeting, resident Doug Oitzinger spoke during citizen comments opposing approval of the plan.

Alderperson Tom Karban moved, seconded by Alderperson Liz Mikutowski, to send the plan back to staff for further updates and to request a cost proposal; that motion failed by a roll-call vote of 2 ayes (Karban, Mikutowski) and 6 nays (Kowalski, Wolfe, Demmith, Skorik, Klegin, Keller). Alderperson Dorothy Kowalski then moved, seconded by Alderperson Chris Lesperance, to approve the plan as presented; that motion carried 6–2.

The council’s minutes record the two formal roll-call outcomes but do not include detailed amendments to the plan text. The approval followed public opposition raised in the citizen comment period but, per the minutes, the council majority supported adopting the document at this meeting.

Next steps listed in the meeting record indicate staff will proceed with implementation steps consistent with the adopted plan; council members previously asked for a cost proposal in the event further budget decisions are required, and the council defeated a motion that would have formally sent the plan back for additional updates.

The meeting adjourned at 6:53 PM.