Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Natatorium Design topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Frankfort board approves contract for schematic design of natatorium and wellness center
Summary
On April 2, 2026, the Frankfort Board of Commissioners unanimously adopted Resolution No. 4 (2026 Series) to authorize a contract for schematic design services for the proposed Natatorium and Wellness Center after a brief presentation by Schmidt and Associates.
The Frankfort Board of Commissioners voted 5–0 on April 2, 2026, to adopt Resolution No. 4 (2026 Series), authorizing a contract for schematic design services for a proposed Natatorium and Wellness Center. The special meeting was held at the Franklin County Health Department Conference Room, 851 East-West Connector, Frankfort, KY, and followed a brief presentation by Schmidt and Associates on the project design phase.
Commissioner Leesa Unger moved to adopt the resolution; Commissioner Katima Smith-Willis seconded the motion. The roll-call vote recorded Commissioners Rob Richardson (participating via GoToMeeting), Leesa Unger, Kelly May, Katima Smith-Willis and Mayor Layne Wilkerson voting in favor; no members voted against the measure. The transcript identifies the action as Resolution No. 4, 2026 Series; the recording does not specify contract dollar amounts, vendor terms, or a contract execution timeline.
The presentation by Schmidt and Associates preceded the motion; the transcript summarizes it as brief and focused on the project design phase but contains no quoted testimony or detailed design specifications. After the vote the Board immediately adopted a motion to adjourn, moved by Commissioner Smith-Willis and seconded by Commissioner Unger; the meeting concluded at 5:47 p.m.
The adopted resolution authorizes staff to proceed with contracting for schematic design services for the Natatorium and Wellness Center. The transcript does not record any public comment, specific budget appropriations, or a timeline for construction. Additional details about contract value, scope, and next procurement steps were not specified in the meeting record and would require follow-up with city staff.
