Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Education Assessments topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Bozeman schools briefed on new year‑long state assessment and local plans to use results

Bozeman School District Board of Trustees · October 15, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

District administrators outlined the state's new year‑long assessment (MASD/MAST), explained why initial results will lack standard proficiency labels until early 2025, and described local plans to integrate the data into the district's PLC/MTSS cycles and parent dashboards.

District leaders spent a substantial portion of the Oct. 14 Bozeman School District board meeting explaining the state's new year‑long assessment and how district staff plan to use it.

The presentation described the district's balanced assessment system — formative classroom checks, common end‑of‑unit summatives and school‑level benchmarks — and placed the state assessment in that context. An administrator said the state assessment's first testing window “opened today” for ELA and math and runs through November, but cautioned that the scores will not be accompanied by final performance labels until the state completes standard setting early next year.

That timing means teachers will be able to see how students answered specific questions and begin local review, but district staff emphasized limits on interpretation for this first cycle. “We will get some results that will give us…our students got this answer correct, but we—re not sure what that actually means moving forward because the standard setting still needs to happen,” a presenter said during the briefing.

School leaders told trustees the new statewide system (piloted in some districts) was intended to provide more timely, instructional data than a single spring test, and that the state plans to develop performance‑level descriptors after the first administration so districts can interpret scores consistently.

Locally, the district intends to surface the new assessment data in its analytics and insights portal and to use the results within PLC cycles and MTSS planning. Administrators also said the state is building a parent portal so families can review item‑level results after each testing cycle, though the district warned parents that initial results will be descriptive rather than tied to a proficiency label until standard setting is complete.

Trustees asked about time lost to assessment, whether pilot districts found the tests useful, and what the Board of Public Education's role will be in approving accountability rules. District staff said pilot districts reported more total minutes spent testing across the year, and that the Board of Public Education will review and approve the accountability framework after the state completes standard setting.

The board received the presentation; no board action was required. The district plans to share the presentation with schools and continue to update trustees as standard setting and reporting features are finalized.