Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Community Partnerships topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

JJAB backs adopting community-partnership work into Capacity Building to serve court-involved youth

Juvenile Justice Advisory Board · April 11, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Juvenile Justice Advisory Board advanced a plan to fold community partnership efforts into its Capacity Building subcommittee to expand prevention and reentry supports, train community providers for court-involved youth, and explore crisis stabilization units. The proposal follows upstream-mapping recommendations.

The Juvenile Justice Advisory Board on April 11 advanced a proposal to incorporate community partnership efforts into its Capacity Building subcommittee to strengthen prevention and reentry services for court-involved youth.

Donna Simmons, a board member who led the Community Partnership Workgroup report, outlined recommendations drawn from an upstream-mapping review. The workgroup recommended surveying community providers to identify regional needs; expanding existing programs so they can also serve youth in detention and out-of-home placement; and providing training for community-based providers on serving court-involved children. The group also recommended exploring the feasibility of crisis stabilization units for youth.

The Capacity Building subcommittee will prioritize leveraging existing workgroups such as KJCMH, increasing youth engagement in community activities and prevention, and creating a consistent training schedule and resource repository for community partners. The workgroup framed these efforts as ways to reduce silos across community, school, court and reentry domains.

Board members emphasized the goal of connecting a wider network of providers—clinicians, educators and community organizations—to services that support rehabilitation and reentry. The workgroup described a “360-degree” approach that spans pre-court interventions through reentry planning.

Votes at a glance: the meeting recorded routine administrative approval of the February minutes and later adjournment; no formal policy votes were taken on the Capacity Building proposal during this session.

Next steps: the board directed the Capacity Building subcommittee to integrate the partnership recommendations into its three-year planning cycle and to return with an implementation plan and training schedule for review.