Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Rezoning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning Commission recommends approval of rezoning for Brycliff Commercial Center

Spring Hill Planning Commission · March 5, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

On March 5, 2026, the Spring Hill Planning Commission voted 8-0 to recommend approval of rezoning application Z-25-5, changing a property a half-mile north of 223rd Street (between U.S. 169 and Webster) from C-2 to MP(P-O). Public commenters raised concerns about industrial zoning and storage facility appearance.

The Spring Hill Planning Commission voted 8-0 on March 5, 2026, to recommend that the city’s governing body approve rezoning application Z-25-5 for the Brycliff Commercial Center.

City Planner Ian Trefren presented the staff report on the request to change the property’s zoning designation from C-2 to MP(P-O); the parcel is located approximately a half-mile north of 223rd Street between U.S. 169 Highway and Webster Street. The public hearing drew three speakers who questioned the proposed change: Terra Combes expressed concern about allowing industrial zoning in certain areas and the precedent that could set; Kristine Coyazo raised concerns about the appearance of storage facilities along the highway; and Kurt Vandepol said the proposed use could constitute an incompatible land use with nearby properties. Vice-Chair Chuck Morse entered a letter opposing the rezoning into the public record as Exhibit A.

After a period of commissioner discussion, Commissioner Chuck Morse moved, and Commissioner Josh Erhart seconded, a motion “to recommend approval of application Z-25-5 rezoning Brycliff Commercial Center to the Spring Hill Governing Body.” The commission passed the motion by voice vote, 8-0-0.

The commission’s recommendation now goes to the Spring Hill governing body for final action; the Planning Commission record notes that the opposition letter was entered as an exhibit. No final decision by the governing body is recorded in these minutes.