Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement Demolition topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council adopts demolition ordinance for deteriorated historic dwelling at 100 Hamilton Street
Summary
Roanoke Rapids council voted to adopt Ordinance 20 26.01 directing code enforcement to demolish and remove the unsafe dwelling at 100 Hamilton Street; staff noted the property has unpaid taxes and nuisance abatement fees and that the ordinance can be rescinded if a rehabilitation meeting code is completed.
Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement Demolition topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Roanoke Rapids City Council voted to adopt Ordinance 20 26.01, authorizing the code enforcement officer to demolish and remove the dwelling at 100 Hamilton Street and place a lien against the real property for removal costs.
Code enforcement staff (Mr. Bale) presented photographs and a description of severe structural failure at the property—interior floors largely collapsed, an open roof allowing weather intrusion, and evidence of long‑term vacancy and neglect. Bale said tax payments had not been made since 2011 and the city has nearly $10,000 in nuisance abatement fees plus about $12,000 in unpaid taxes. He described an earlier, multi‑year process that began in 2023 and said the city has posted hearing notices and attempted owner/ heir contact.
During council discussion city attorney staff explained that tax liens are administered by the county and that demolition liens are treated as a special assessment with lower priority in foreclosure collections. The planning director noted section 5 of Ordinance 20 26.01 provides that council may rescind the demolition ordinance if an owner or interested party rehabilitates the dwelling to meet code requirements.
Councilman Jackson moved to adopt Ordinance 20 26.01 directing demolition; the motion was seconded by Councilman Veil and carried on a voice vote. No financial estimates for the cost of demolition were presented at the meeting; staff said the ordinance authorizes further action to determine removal expenses and to place the lien. The council also emphasized willingness to work with anyone who steps forward to rehabilitate the property and noted public safety concerns from children entering the structure.

