Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Tax Exemption topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

County weighs first property tax‑exemption application after 3.5% state valuation increase

Anaconda-Deer Lodge County Commission · June 9, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

County staff told commissioners a 3.5% valuation increase triggered a tax‑exemption review; the county attorney recommended approval absent clear grounds for denial and urged the Commission to adopt local criteria to guide future cases before the statutory deadline.

County Chief Financial Officer Eric Hoiland told the Commission the Department of Revenue returned the county’s application review showing a 3.5% increase in assessed value, exceeding the 2.5% statutory threshold that opens the tax‑exemption process. “We got the application back from the State of Montana, and they did come back with an increase of 3.5% which does exceed the 2.5%,” Hoiland said.

County Attorney Morgan Smith summarized the statutory process and recommended approval of this application at next week’s voting meeting unless the Commission can articulate a statutory reason for denial. She said staff had prepared examples of resolutions from other Montana jurisdictions and advised adopting local criteria so taxpayers understand the county’s expectations. “Without more information I think denial of it would be difficult to articulate a reason to,” Morgan Smith told commissioners, and she recommended the Commission consider a resolution that makes clear approving one application does not establish a precedent for future approvals.

Commissioners discussed the potential fiscal impact if such exemptions became more frequent and sought clarity on oversight and enforcement. Eric Hoiland said the Department of Revenue performs the site assessment and tracks whether property owners meet the work requirements; Morgan Smith noted the statute provides for recapture of property taxes if a taxpayer receives abatement but fails to complete required work during the abatement period. The County’s decision is scheduled for next week; if the Commission approves, staff said the action would be taken by formal resolution as contemplated by the statute.

Why it matters: This is a first‑impression application for Anaconda‑Deer Lodge County and, if approved, could reduce tax collections for the affected parcel during the abatement period. Commissioners asked staff to return with draft local criteria so future applicants and the public understand how the county will evaluate such requests.

What’s next: The Commission is scheduled to consider formal action by resolution at its next voting meeting before the statutory deadline.