Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Opioid Data Priorities topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Subcommittee spotlights PDMP analytics, prerelease Medicaid and real-time surveillance in reviewing Nevada opioid plan
Summary
Subcommittee members reviewed the 2022 opioid needs assessment and highlighted using PDMP analytics, prerelease Medicaid enrollment, wastewater testing and ODMAP for improved surveillance and rapid response; members asked for a master list of funded programs and stronger evaluation metrics.
During its first meeting, the Resilient Nevada subcommittee on social determinants of health and data reviewed priority recommendations from the 2022 Nevada opioid needs assessment and discussed specific data-driven tools the state could use to prevent overdoses and improve rapid response.
Alyssa Deplanis, who described her work on overdose surveillance and state treatment datasets, summarized the plan’s data recommendations: “provide reports or analytics from the prescription drug monitoring program that allow the State to identify demographic characteristics of those prescribed controlled substances for prevention of future overdoses,” and to “implement initiatives prior to release from prison that provide information on and connection to post-release treatment and housing.” She also noted wastewater testing and the ODMAP application as examples of real-time or near-real-time surveillance to inform response.
Presenters and members discussed policy and operational constraints. Tina noted that the Fund for Resilient Nevada and staff consider state law and settlement language—citing NRS 433.738—when deciding allowable projects. The group also discussed Medicaid prerelease enrollment (a 90-day prerelease window was mentioned) as an important tool for continuity of care after incarceration.
Members agreed that many prior recommendations in the biennial report are high-level and need to be translated into implementable steps. TJ Mills recommended validating methods and measuring program fidelity and impact, saying the subcommittee should determine whether previously supported approaches are producing intended results.
The subcommittee requested that staff produce a master list of FRN-funded programs and projects, which members said would help identify which activities to evaluate and which gaps remain. The group also discussed potential recruitment of epidemiologists, corrections experts and academic partners to strengthen technical capacity.
No formal votes were taken; the subcommittee will continue drafting actionable recommendations and reconvene in April to prepare input for the biannual report and the 2027 planning cycle.
