Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Real Estate topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Delano City Council holds closed session to consider offer on landlocked 1.8‑acre industrial parcel
Summary
At its May 5 meeting the Delano City Council entered a closed session to consider an offer and negotiations for Parcel 107058001020 in the Delano Industrial Park; city staff told the council the lot is landlocked, development is constrained and roadway extension would cost the city more than $400,000.
Get email alerts on the Real Estate topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Delano City Council/Economic Development Authority met May 5 and moved into a closed session to consider an offer and negotiations for Parcel 107058001020, a 1.8‑acre lot in the Delano Industrial Park.
City Administrator Phil Kern briefed the council in open session before the closed meeting, describing the parcel as landlocked and noting physical constraints — including topography, a natural‑gas line and roadway corridor limits — that complicate development. Kern said the parcel lies south of Johnson Drive, east of 7th Street and north of the Maplewood Estates neighborhood and that earlier platting imagined a 9th Street South extension that was never built. He told the council extending roadway infrastructure to serve the parcel would cost the city more than $400,000. Kern also said Landscape Structures recently purchased property west of the parcel and had submitted an offer; he clarified the council was not being asked to approve development plans during the open session.
After the briefing, Councilmember Jason Franzen moved and Councilmember Peter Froehle seconded a motion to enter closed session to discuss terms and negotiations related to the offer; the motion carried. The minutes record that the council later exited closed session on the same night; no open‑session vote to approve a sale or specific terms is recorded in the minutes.
The briefing emphasized the tradeoffs the city faces: selling the parcel to a nearby industrial buyer could support local jobs and property reuse, but the land’s physical and access constraints — plus neighborhood opposition cited in prior discussions — limit development potential and may require municipal investment to make the site buildable. The council did not record a public decision on the sale during the May 5 meeting. The matter is likely to return to council or EDA consideration after closed‑session negotiations.
