Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Economic Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Mount Angel hears plan to reconstitute enterprise zone with regional partners to spur job growth
Summary
Secor and the Mid‑Valley council of governments briefed the council on reconstituting an enterprise zone—explaining eligibility, a typical 3–5 year property‑tax exemption and a 10% job‑growth requirement—and councilors asked for historical outcomes, cost and staffing details before deciding whether to participate or partner with Silverton.
Secor representative Kid Morris and Laura Conroy of the council of governments presented the Mount Angel City Council with a proposal to reconstitute an enterprise zone that would include parts of Mount Angel and, potentially, adjacent Silverton.
The presenters said the program is intended to "encourage local job creation and private investment by offering temporary property tax extensions on new facilities, equipment, and industrial expansions," and they described the enterprise zone as a regional economic development tool that was first established in 1985 and previously operated in the Silverton–Mount Angel area.
Presenters outlined key program mechanics: eligible projects must be new investments (a minimum project threshold was discussed in the meeting), exemptions typically run three to five years and applications require demonstrable increases in employment. "Your requirement for increase in employees is 10%," a presenter said, using average full‑time‑equivalent counts that can include part‑time work.
Councilors pressed for specifics about management, cost and local benefits. Several asked whether Mount Angel would have to partner with Silverton or could apply on its own; Conroy said the city can apply independently but that combining data with parts of Silverton is a common regional approach to meet the program's economic‑hardship criteria. She told the council the next procedural steps include notifying Business Oregon, mapping qualifying census tracts, notifying taxing districts and reaching agreement with the applicable school district before filing the formal application.
Several councilors raised fiscal and operational concerns: whether Mount Angel would be billed for management services, how fees would be assessed and whether an aggregated partnership would result in a disproportionate share of benefits flowing to Silverton rather than Mount Angel. One councilor summarized the concern as the city potentially "funding growth in another community." Presenters said management is typically fee‑based and paid by the applying business, that initial constituency work has been funded out of existing council‑of‑governments funds in past examples, and that Secor and the COG would follow up with details on fee structures and staffing commitments.
Council members requested specific follow‑up materials before taking action: historical data showing how much benefit previously flowed to Mount Angel versus Silverton, sample management contracts and sample council resolutions, a proposed fee schedule and an inventory of available industrial or commercial land in Mount Angel. Presenters agreed to return with those materials and noted they are scheduled to present the same proposal to Silverton's city council next week.
The council did not take formal action on the enterprise zone at the meeting; members asked staff and the presenters for the follow‑up items that will inform any future direction or a possible resolution to initiate the application process.
What happens next: staff and the presenters will provide the historical project data, sample documents and estimates of city staff time and fees; the council said members expect to attend the Silverton presentation and will revisit the item once that information is available.
