Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parks topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Myrtle Creek council to research park rules after Roseburg attorney flags First Amendment concerns
Summary
Staff presented Roseburg's recent park-regulation revisions and councilors asked for time to review possible permit language before drafting a Myrtle Creek park ordinance that would balance event permits and free-speech protections.
City Administrator Lonnie Rainville told the council that Roseburg recently revised park regulations after the Roseburg city attorney found prior language infringed on First Amendment rights. Rainville said Roseburg reworded its resolution and readopted the measure in February.
Council members discussed how a permit process could apply to events that are privately organized but open to the public. Councilor Robert Chaney requested time for council to review Roseburg's materials and asked staff to bring back suggested language before the council drafts any ordinance. A permit option discussed would require individuals who want to hand out materials in a city park to complete an application; council consensus was to continue researching ordinance language.
Councilors emphasized the need to protect constitutional speech rights while allowing the city to manage use of park facilities, such as scheduled events and vendor activities. No ordinance language or formal vote was taken at the Sept. 17 meeting; councilors directed staff to research model language and return with recommendations.
The City Attorney opinion in Roseburg was discussed as background and councilors asked that staff present a scope and draft language at a future meeting so the council could consider tradeoffs between permitting and free-speech protections.
