Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Childcare topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Parents tell Wauwatosa board late childcare notices and special-ed staffing are forcing tough choices
Summary
During public comment, parents urged the Wauwatosa School Board to guarantee wraparound childcare and to address special-education teacher turnover and aide qualifications that they say harm student outcomes.
Get email alerts on the Childcare topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Several parents raised concerns about childcare continuity and special-education staffing during the public-comment period at the Wauwatosa School Board meeting on July 20.
Rachel Kazicky, speaking as an Eisenhower parent, said she and other families learned on July 7 from the school principal and more recently from Blue Door Academy that the district’s before- and after-school wraparound programs are contingent on enrollment minimums. According to the parent’s account, the stated thresholds are 10 students for JK wraparound, 20 for before-school care and 30 for after-school care, and families were told the district would not make enrollment determinations before Oct. 1, with only about four weeks’ notice provided before any change.
"There are strict minimums — 10 people for JK wraparound, 20 people for before school care, 30 people for after school care — and they won't be giving us an answer before the school year starts," Kazicky said, describing the effect on working parents who need to plan childcare and, in some cases, whether they can remain in the district.
Catherine Hudson, an online commenter who identified herself as a Washington parent, said special-education teacher retention at her school has been poor and that aides' qualifications vary. "Our data shows in our district that our students with IEPs are not doing as well as their peers. I would argue that part of that is probably the lack of consistency in high quality staff," Hudson said, and urged the board to ask district administration to examine retention and qualifications for aides.
District staff acknowledged the concerns and described plans to review staffing and to communicate with families about program availability. Board members asked that staff look into retention drivers and reported that the district will incorporate required changes to handbooks and policies driven by the recently enacted Act 89.
The public comment period closed after the board heard both in-room and online remarks. No formal action on wraparound programming was taken at the meeting; parents requested earlier notice and assurance of program continuity.
Next steps noted by board members included staff follow-up with families and potential administrative review of alternative program arrangements and retention strategies.

