Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Emergency Medical Services topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bayfield County committee hears push for county-level EMS transport; public forums planned
Summary
At an April 27 meeting, the Sheriff’s Committee reviewed stakeholder feedback favoring basic life-support (BLS) county transport, but members noted no consensus on funding; public forums are scheduled for the end of May.
The Bayfield County Sheriff’s Committee on April 27 received an update on county EMS proposals and stakeholder engagement that showed broad interest in basic life-support (BLS) transport but no clear agreement on how to pay for it. Quaderer, the county’s emergency management official, told the committee that stakeholder responses averaged about 55 responses per question and that public forums will be held at the end of May to gather additional input.
Quaderer said unanimous consensus for a county-run transporting service is unrealistic and recommended the board lean on EMS community input and the findings of recent EMS studies in deciding next steps. She also said the county has published an EMS landing page to centralize materials and upcoming engagement opportunities.
Committee member Jeff Holte emphasized the need for “concrete data” to inform such a consequential decision, and Jackie Roguski asked when residents might see cost estimates. Quaderer said she is working with county administration to develop an estimate of what a county transporting service would cost.
The stakeholder results reported to the committee indicated a majority preference for BLS transport, but no consensus on a funding model emerged from the engagement. The committee did not take a formal vote on policy at the meeting; next steps are the public forums at the end of May and further analysis by county staff.
