Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Wichita board adopts bell-to-bell personal-electronic-device policy, directs report on rollout
Summary
The Wichita Board of Education voted 6–0 July 20 to adopt a bell-to-bell personal-electronic-device policy. The board directed administration to train staff, roll out communications immediately and return with an implementation report before Oct. 12, noting possible budget needs for storage solutions.
The Wichita Public Schools Board of Education voted 6–0 July 20 to adopt a districtwide personal-electronic-device policy that bars personal devices from being accessible during the school day and directs administrators to implement consistent storage and enforcement procedures.
Board President Stan moved the motion; it was seconded by Diane Albert and carried unanimously. The motion instructs administration to implement the policy, begin staff and principal training immediately, provide communications materials for families and to return to the board with a report on implementation and “success” measures before Oct. 12 or earlier if problems arise.
The decision followed an extended debate about enforcement and equity across Wichita’s varied schools. Dr. Lauren Hatfield, chief of schools, said the district intends a firm rule for all schools: “We should not see a personal electronic device in any of our schools from when the bell rings to finish the day.” She and other administrators described a rollout that will include administrator training, a district one‑pager for families, school-level templates that name designated storage locations, and videos featuring principals to explain expectations to students and parents.
Board members pressed administration for details on consistency and resourcing. Board member Amy Warren said she supports the policy but cautioned it will not be flawless at launch: “I have no expectations that this is gonna go 100% right out of the gate just because there are humans involved,” she said, urging patience and close monitoring. Several board members asked for clarity on who enforces violations and whether teachers would be forced into enforcement roles; administrators responded that initial intervention should be handled by teachers but that administrators or designees would ultimately manage confiscation, parent contact and consequence administration.
CFO Addie Lowell said one‑time capital funds could pay for storage solutions at some schools but warned that sustained staffing to manage check-in/check-out would be costly across large high schools: “The solution for staffing the storage solution… is more of a challenge,” she said, noting operating-budget constraints.
Administration listed short-term and long-term supports: a drafted FAQ for staff, a district one‑pager for enrollment events, school templates for designated storage, social-media copy, short videos with school leaders, and an internal communications plan. Superintendent Kelly told the board administrators will be trained the next day and principals will be expected to follow the district template while tailoring designated storage to building realities.
The board’s motion also asked administration to include in the report any budget considerations — immediate or for future budgets — necessary to support consistent implementation. If significant shortfalls or unforeseen operational issues arise, the board directed staff to return sooner than the scheduled reporting date.
The policy adoption completes the district’s response to recent state legislation requiring clearer personal-device rules. The board and administration said the aim is to reduce distractions, improve engagement and make enforcement equitable across schools; enforcement details, budget impacts and early indicators of success will be part of the board’s requested follow-up.
