Narberth committee weighs defining ‘fitness’ uses in zoning to avoid unintended frontage restrictions

On July 14 the Narberth Finance Administration Committee discussed a planning-commission memo recommending a new, specific definition for "fitness" uses in the zoning code so gyms and studios are not classified as "personal care" uses, which currently trigger a 350‑foot proximity restriction that can exclude fitness businesses from main commercial frontage on Haverford Avenue.

Manager Meg Dobbs explained that under current practice, in the absence of a specific definition the zoning officer classifies a use based on the closest analogous category — historically treating fitness studios as a personal-care use — and that practice can keep such uses off main corridors. She told the committee that the planning commission’s intent was not to ban fitness uses from Haverford Avenue but to avoid certain activity directly at the primary frontage: "we shouldn't have treadmills fronting the windows," Dobbs said, characterizing the planning commission's concern that exercise equipment visible at the street could conflict with a desired retail/restaurant streetscape.

Committee members raised concerns that the memo’s wording could be read as more restrictive than intended. One member said the language sounded like fitness uses would be required to locate at rear entrances while restaurants should occupy storefronts; staff and members agreed this point needs clearer drafting. Dobbs said the draft recommendation includes separate definitions for "fitness studio" and "indoor recreation" and suggested the planning commission and staff will refine the text so the ordinance amendment accurately reflects the commission’s intent.

The committee did not vote on a code change; members asked staff to clarify the proposed frontage language with the planning commission and noted the formal drafting and review process would include a subsequent public comment period. Staff said the ordinance amendment would have to return to the planning commission and then to council for authorization to advertise before adoption; depending on timing the item could reach the planning commission in August or September.

The committee requested that planning-commission staff be present at the council discussion to answer wording and intent questions before formal introduction.