Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Elk Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Cannon Beach residents urge action after rising elk encounters; experts caution limits of sterilization
Summary
Residents described repeated close, sometimes aggressive, encounters with elk and pressed the council for signage, enforcement of no‑feeding rules and fencing options. ODFW and collaborative researchers said some long‑term options (sterilization, mass relocation) are limited and recommended layered nonlethal measures and targeted public education.
Dozens of Cannon Beach residents used the council’s public‑comment period to describe frequent and sometimes frightening encounters with elk, pressing the city to act to reduce risks to people and pets.
Bob Attia, who described a regional collaborative process, told the council that the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) had issued damage tags that led to “77 cow elk killed over a 3 year period” on a single property in another community, and urged the city to think carefully about management approaches before entering any formal agreement with ODFW. “What happened up there could also happen here,” Attia said.
The council then heard a presentation from Denise Loughman, executive director of the Columbia River Estuary Study Task Force, who summarized the 2019–2022 Clatsop Plains Elk Collaborative. The collaborative produced four working toolkits—elk management, research and data collection, human‑management, and land‑use recommendations—and emphasized education, no‑feeding ordinances, targeted landscaping guidance and community‑scale fencing approaches as first‑line responses.
Paul Atwood, introduced as the district wildlife biologist for ODFW, told the council the collaborative had evaluated a wide range of options and that some widely discussed measures are impractical at scale. On chemical sterilization he said the biology and logistics limit its usefulness: "Sterilization wasn't a recommendation from the health management subcommittee because it's not a long‑term solution. It's also not logistically viable," he said, noting that chemical contraceptives require repeated dosing and that adult elk can live and reproduce for many years, delaying any population effect.
Atwood also explained that targeted removal of individual aggressive animals is sometimes used when animals have repeatedly attacked people or caused serious safety incidents: “They’re euthanized,” he said describing last‑resort responses in past incidents. He stressed that relocation and mass removals carry disease‑quarantine and other legal constraints and that relocation is no longer a standard large‑scale tool.
Councilors and residents pressed for near‑term safety steps: funded public‑education campaigns, clear signage at trailheads and town entrances, stronger enforcement of a no‑feeding ordinance, and pilot fencing guidance for property owners. Several residents asked the council to allow taller garden fencing where appropriate and to provide landscaping guidance (plant lists and best practices) that make yards less attractive to elk.
Councilor Kerr said the city has initiated a marketing and education contract; staff told the council a kickoff meeting with the contractor is scheduled and that the advertising effort will include safety guidance for residents and visitors.
What’s next: The council directed staff to develop a public‑education and signage plan, to review no‑feeding enforcement options, and to return with a report on fencing policy and possible regulatory changes. Any future decision about lethal removal or a city‑led capture program would require separate public hearings and explicit council direction.
Sources: public comments and statements in the April 13, 2026 Cannon Beach City Council meeting (presentations by Denise Loughman and Paul Atwood; multiple resident commenters).
