Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Signage topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Wildwood committee asks staff to study painted-window sign exceptions after business complaint
Summary
Facing a request from a town‑center retailer, the Wildwood Economic Development Committee voted to ask staff to research options to accommodate painted window art while preserving a 4–7 foot clear-vision zone for safety and consistent application across businesses.
The Wildwood Economic Development Committee voted to direct staff to study options for handling painted window signage and return with clearer definitions and police input.
Staff member (S2) told the committee the code currently limits window coverage to 30% of the glazed area but lacks clear definitions for painted murals in panes. The department flagged a recent painted display celebrating Route 66/USA 250 that exceeded the 4–7‑foot clear zone used to ensure officers can see into storefronts.
"The idea tonight is looking at this photo and looking at the idea of painted signs," the staff member said, urging a sit‑down with the business owner before any code change. He added that moving painted work into an upper panel could meet the 30% threshold while preserving sightlines.
Several council members said the goal should be consistent treatment for all businesses. One committee member (S4) warned that broad exceptions could prompt every retailer to paint full‑pane murals and urged a single standard for all window treatments.
"If we start allowing exceptions, then no one's gonna do window clings — everyone will go to painting," the committee member said, arguing for a uniform rule tied to placement and percentage of glazing.
Committee members discussed options the staff had outlined: keep the existing 30% rule; allow painted signs only in an upper panel so the 4–7‑foot sightline remains clear; or create a narrowly drawn exception with amortization for existing displays. Staff also suggested consulting Captain Mondell of the county police for operational input on visibility.
After debate, the committee passed a motion directing staff to return at the next meeting with clarified definitions (including side‑panel and top‑panel language), recommended percentages and placement guidance, and police input on the 4–7‑foot clear zone. The motion passed by voice vote without an announced roll‑call tally.
Next steps: staff will meet with the business owner and Captain Mondell, prepare draft language showing how painted panels could be accommodated while maintaining public‑safety sightlines, and bring version(s) back to the committee for recommendation to the full City Council.
