Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Retreat Planning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board plans two-day retreat to tackle communication, enrollment and self-evaluation; superintendent to seek facilitators

Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools Board of Education · September 19, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools Board set topics for an Oct. 9–10 retreat focused on board-community engagement, enrollment trends and a board self-evaluation; members asked the superintendent to seek outside facilitators and recommended authorizing the chair and vice chair to approve a facilitator under a $1,500 threshold.

The Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools Board of Education set aside two evenings, Oct. 9 and 10 from 4:30 to 7:30 p.m., for a fall retreat aimed at improving board communication, examining enrollment trends and conducting a board self-evaluation.

During the superintendent’s report, board members and staff debated how much of the retreat should be facilitated externally and which topics might be handled in-house. The board chair framed the retreat as an opportunity for the board to collaborate and asked members what they wanted to prioritize.

Several members urged making board-community engagement an explicit retreat item, including discussions of office hours, social media and how the board responds to emails sent to multiple members. "I think we probably need to think about how we do it," one board member said, urging structured discussion of engagement strategies.

Enrollment decline drew sustained attention. A board member asked for data about where students have gone and whether departures reflect private school, charter school, homeschooling, moves out of state or other causes. Staff noted the district has already shared some analyses but agreed the board would benefit from an external population study. The board and staff identified NC State’s Integrated Planning for School and Community group and Carolina Demography as potential external partners to analyze trends and projections.

Board members also debated using an outside facilitator for the board self-evaluation. Some members said a neutral outside facilitator would improve candid assessment; others argued the board can handle community-engagement discussions internally to conserve funds. Members cited the spring facilitator fee for one consultant, Mr. Sutton, at $1,500 and discussed seeking lower-cost local or virtual options.

The board asked the superintendent to reach out to several prospective facilitators, including Mr. Sutton, Dr. Bridges and the dispute settlement center, and to report estimates back to the board. Board members discussed authorizing the chair and vice chair to approve a facilitator and fee under a not-to-exceed threshold (discussed informally as $1,500) so staff could proceed promptly.

Next steps: the superintendent will contact prospective facilitators and outside researchers and return recommended options to the board; enrollment-research partners and facilitator estimates will determine whether the enrollment topic appears at the October retreat or a later session.