Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
State representative warns Orange residents Act 181 could impose new costs and restrictions on rural land use
Summary
Representative Mike Tagliavea addressed the March 3 Orange town meeting, warning that Act 181's tiering and an 800‑foot private‑road rule could trigger Act 250 permitting, add engineering costs for stormwater and hydrology reports and constrain rural development; he encouraged residents to follow committee work and engage on the rules.
Orange — Representative Mike Tagliavea addressed the town meeting from Montpelier to warn residents that pieces of Act 181 could impose new restrictions and costs on rural landowners.
Tagliavea, introduced by the moderator, said the bill package includes what he described as an 800‑foot private‑road rule that could trigger Act 250‑type permits for new or extended private roads, increasing costs for rural development projects. He told the room that compliance could require hydrology and engineering studies that may cost tens of thousands of dollars in some cases and could deter small, incremental construction projects such as a private camp or driveway. "If you've got 30 acres and it's been in your family for a long time, and now all of a sudden you want to put a road in to build a camp... the Act 250 is soaking all of that up," he said.
He also summarized concerns about the conservation‑design map and tiering in Act 181; Tagliavea said what had been an advisory map is being targeted in statute and that, without careful rulemaking, land could be newly restricted. He urged residents to review Acts and Resolves on vermont.gov and to engage with legislative committees and working groups; he said committee hearings are available on YouTube and residents can sign up to follow committees on specific topics such as education, environment or energy.
Tagliavea said he sits on the environment committee and that he supports some amendments proposed by other legislators that he thinks would better protect rural communities. He described the situation as evolving (some elements still in rulemaking) and encouraged residents to contact their representatives and volunteer for committee work.
What to watch: Tagliavea’s remarks highlight that Act 181’s implementation depends on rulemaking and local mapping; residents concerned about land‑use impacts should monitor the land use review board’s rulemaking and testify during public comment periods.
