Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the 15 Sunset Drive topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission reviews concerns over proposed work at 15 Sunset Drive; historical significance questioned
Summary
The commission discussed an abutter's concern about proposed work at 15 Sunset Drive (Plum Island), reviewed plans and town records, and concluded it cannot formally act until a demolition permit or formal request is filed; members questioned the 1890 construction date cited in correspondence and noted the town bylaw's 1830 age threshold.
Members of the Newbury Historical Commission reviewed correspondence and plans for 15 Sunset Drive on Plum Island after an abutter raised preservation concerns. The letter, read to the commission, described the existing structure as a one-story, wood-frame building "built approximately in 1890;" commission members said the assessor's online records and town deed searches did not confirm that early a date.
Committee member (S2) summarized the outreach from inspectional services and noted that Peter (town staff) added the item to the town meeting agenda and would share records with the zoning board. "The existing structure is one story wood frame and built approximately in 1890, which we cannot confirm," S2 said while recounting the abutter's submission.
Commission members debated whether the property fits the Demolition Delay Bylaw criteria. The bylaw's age threshold in some references is 1830; members observed that if the abutter's date were 1890 the structure would not automatically qualify by age alone. Several members suggested that the only remaining significance argument might be that the cottage represents "20th century camp and cottage vernacular" and that the commission would need to determine whether that vernacular is architecturally significant.
Members made clear the commission has no authority to place a demolition delay on a property until an application or demolition permit is actually filed with the town. "We can't do anything official until we get a demolition request," Committee member (S3) said. The commission agreed to monitor the town's permit filings, to gather additional documentation about the structure's age and character, and to take photographs and compare nearby cottages to assess whether this is an unusually rare example meriting preservation.
The commission also noted procedural follow-ups: inspectional services will share materials with the zoning board and town council will discuss the property with managers; the commission plans to attend or monitor that discussion. No formal preservation designation or vote was made at the July 9 meeting.
Next steps: staff and members will collect more documentary and photographic evidence of the cottage's age and style, follow the town's permit postings, and report back if an official demolition application is submitted.
